Research Report

Bisphenol A Stays in Body Longer Than Previously Thought

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a toxic chemical commonly used in plastic bottles, in spite of its links to several serious health problems like heart disease and liver failure. That alone is reason enough to support banning its use in products. Manufacturers who use BPA in their products have been able to downplay the risks by citing research indicating that levels of BPA declined quickly.

A new study released by researchers at the University of Rochester challenges those findings, showing that newly-consumed BPA declines initially, but then remains in the body:

[Environmental health scientist Richard] Stahlhut says that it appears that the amount of BPA in the body drops relatively rapidly from four to nine hours after exposure, but then levels out. "After the nine hours or so," he says, "it stops doing what it's supposed to and the decline goes flat."

[...]

"This suggests substantial nonfood exposure, accumulation in body tissues such as fat, or both," the researchers wrote in their paper released today by Environmental Health Perspectives.

That may explain why 93 percent of Americans carry BPA in their bodies, according to the CDC, or it could be that exposure is coming through different routes than food, such as the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes often used for water lines in modern homes.

[...]

The U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Toxicology Program—a government program that coordinates federal studies of chemicals' adverse effects—warns that BPA exposure may lead to abnormal development in infants and the Canadian government last year banned its use in baby bottles. But the American Chemistry Council, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency maintain that BPA is safe.

Click here to learn more about the risks of BPA exposure, and what we need to do in Connecticut to protect against them.

Pain at the Pump: The War is a Cause of Seven-fold Increase in Oil Prices Since 2002

Gas prices are at record highs, and Americans are getting hit hard as we head toward Independence Day celebrations with our friends and loved ones. There doesn't appear to be any relief on the horizon, either.

FactCheck.org: Bush Wrong about Health Insurance for Children

The president mischaracterizes congressional efforts to expand the SCHIP program.



Summary


President Bush gave a false description of proposed legislation to expand the 10-year-old federal program to provide health insurance for children in low-income working families.

Issues: 

Kids Waiting for Coverage: How Many Are in Your State?

Families USA Special Report

You may know that Congress is poised to pass the children's health bill. But what does this mean for children in Connecticut?

A new report from Families USA spells out how many additional children would be covered in each state under the House and Senate bills.

Click here to view the report (pdf).

Issues: 

Setting the Record Straight on the Financial Impact of Universal Coverage

healthcare4every1.org - April 16, 2007

As Connecticut confronts one of the most critical issues facing its families, communities and economy, it’s imperative that lawmakers and the public get accurate information, and that has to start with the press.

The Hartford Courant’s front page health care story on Tuesday underscored what happens when reporters do not have a full grasp of a complex issue or the facts. The information in the story not only flew in the face of fair and accurate coverage, but also flew in the face of common sense. The only thing more absurd than the story’s suggestion that the single-payer plan bill approved by committee last month would cost the state of Connecticut between $11.8 billion and $18 billion was that it appeared in a page 1 story. This was a disservice to the public.

Subscribe to Research Report